INMO Air 3 vs Ray-Ban Meta Display
Hesitating between the INMO Air 3 and the Ray-Ban Meta Display? Here are both models side by side, using the specs and prices from our benchmark.
Key differences
- Ray-Ban Meta Display is 66 g lighter than INMO Air 3.
- INMO Air 3 offers a 16° wider field of view than Ray-Ban Meta Display.
- INMO Air 3 has a 16 MP camera against 12 MP for Ray-Ban Meta Display.
- Ray-Ban Meta Display lasts 4.5 h longer on a charge than INMO Air 3.
Specifications
| INMO Air 3 | Ray-Ban Meta Display | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | HUD glasses | HUD glasses |
| Status | On sale | On sale |
| Release date | September 2025 | September 2025 |
| Weight | 135 g | 69 g |
| Display | waveguide optics, Sony micro OLED display | monocular waveguide (right lens) |
| Resolution | 1080p | 600x600 |
| Field of view | 36° | 20° |
| Brightness | 600 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | - |
| Camera | 16 MP | 12 MP |
| Battery (glasses) | 1.5 h | 6 h |
| Chip | Qualcomm XR chipset | - |
| Connectivity | Standalone (implied Wi-Fi for Play Store apps) | Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.3, paired with Meta Neural Band (sEMG wristband) |
| Speakers | open-ear directional speakers | open-ear stereo |
| Needs a cable | No | - |
| Price | - | $799 |
| Video | - | 1080p @ 30fps |
| AI assistant | - | Meta AI |
| On-device AI | - | No |
| Microphones | - | 6-mic array |
Best for: INMO Air 3
Users seeking fully wireless, standalone HUD glasses with a high-refresh-rate display and integrated camera for brief sessions.
Best for: Ray-Ban Meta Display
Users seeking a heads-up display with wristband gesture controls for live translation, media capture, and Meta AI access.